“Manufacturing Is Not a National Security Issue” — The Myth That Industry and Defense Missions Are Separate

Manufacturing is an economic matter — not a national security concern

REALITY

The Manufacturing USA network is a strategic national asset supporting defense readiness, secure supply chains, and U.S. technological leadership

PICTURED HERE:

Advanced defense manufacturing — ARM Institute robotic systems. (Source: Manufacturing USA 2025 Report)

The Stereotype

Manufacturing is primarily an economic and trade issue — about jobs, wages, and industrial competitiveness. National security is a separate domain, handled by defense appropriations and the military. The factory floor and the battlefield are different conversations.

 

The Reality

The ability to manufacture is the ability to defend. Every weapons system, every piece of military equipment, every critical medical supply and communications technology that national security depends on, has to be manufactured somewhere. When that capability erodes or moves offshore, so does the strategic option it supports.

The COVID-19 pandemic made this concrete: the United States could not rapidly scale domestic production of personal protective equipment, ventilators, or vaccine manufacturing capacity because the industrial base for those goods had largely moved abroad. The same vulnerability exists across the defense industrial base — and adversaries know it.

 

How the Manufacturing USA Network Supports Defense

Nine of the seventeen Manufacturing USA institutes are DOD-sponsored. Their mission is explicitly national security:

  • ARM Institute (Pittsburgh, PA) builds enabled robotic systems for defense manufacturing applications and military readiness. Its collaboration with the Office of the Secretary of War on the ManTech Point of Need Challenge — and its AI enabled robotic quality inspection now running across 12 Stellantis plants — demonstrates the direct line from institute R&D to defense-industrial capability.
  • America Makes (Youngstown, OH) has developed additive manufacturing techniques for high-Mach aircraft systems and works directly with DOD on defense-specific AM applications. Its Standardization Roadmap creates the technical foundation that defense contractors need to qualify additively manufactured components for military use.
  • BioFabUSA (Manchester, NH) is building domestic cell-based and regenerative manufacturing capabilities that have direct defense medical applications — including tissue-engineered wound care and trauma treatment capabilities that cannot be sourced from foreign manufacturers in a conflict scenario. BioFabUSA’s DOL-approved Registered Apprenticeship Program for Biofabrication Technicians is also building the specialized workforce these capabilities require.
  • PowerAmerica (Raleigh, NC) has commercialized 10+ wide bandgap (WBG) semiconductor technologies — the power electronics underpinning electric vehicles, grid inverters, radar systems, and directed energy weapons. WBG semiconductors can reduce power conversion losses by 50%+ versus conventional silicon; 40% of PowerAmerica’s projects have reached or are approaching commercial scale, strengthening a domestic supply chain for a technology critical to both defense and energy independence.
  • IACMI (Knoxville, TN) develops advanced composite materials used in aerospace structures, military vehicles, and protective systems. IACMI’s partnerships with Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the University of Tennessee, and defense primes ensure that lightweight, high-strength composite manufacturing capabilities remain rooted in the United States.

The Strategic Argument

The United States’ strategic competitors understand the link between manufacturing and national security in ways that public discourse often does not. China has established more than 33 Manufacturing Innovation Centers under its Made in China 2025 strategy. Germany’s Fraunhofer network operates 76 institutes with government program funding at approximately 19.6 times U.S. per-manufacturing-GDP investment.

The Manufacturing USA network — 17 institutes, 9 federal agencies, $539.9M in FY2023 investment — is the U.S. response. Sustaining and growing is not an economic choice. It is a national security imperative.

Manufacturing USA network: 9 of 17 institutes DOD-sponsored; $539.9M total investment FY2023; 929 active R&D projects; 2,900+ member organizations in all 50 states and Puerto Rico. Source: NIST AMS 600-19.